To earn your CyberOps Professional certification you must pass the 350-201 CBRCOR exam and an eligible concentration exam of your choice, such as 300-220 CBRTHD. Passing the 300-220 CBRTHD exam also earns you the Cisco Certified Specialist – Threat Hunting and Defending certification. Passcert provides the latest Cisco CyberOps Professional 300-220 CBRTHD Dumps to help you get all the tips you need to prepare for the real Conducting Threat Hunting and Defending using Cisco Technologies for CyberOps test. By utilizing the Cisco CyberOps Professional 300-220 CBRTHD Dumps, you can significantly increase your chances of success in the Cisco 300-220 exam on your first attempt. 

The Conducting Threat Hunting and Defending using Cisco Technologies for CyberOps v1.0 (CBRTHD 300-220) exam is a 90-minute exam that is associated with the CyberOps Professional Certification. This exam certifies a candidate's knowledge for conducting threat hunting and defending including threat modeling techniques, threat actor attribution techniques, threat hunting techniques, threat hunting processes, and threat hunting outcomes. 

Exam Code: 300-220 CBRTHD

Exam Name: Conducting Threat Hunting and Defending using Cisco Technologies for CyberOps

Duration: 90 minutes

Languages: English

Price: $300 USD

Associated certifications: Cisco Certified CyberOps Professional, Cisco Certified Specialist – Threat Hunting and Defending

1.1 Apply the Threat Hunting Maturity Model to an organization's environment, as it relates to the Pyramid of Pain

1.2 Describe threats and how to model them with standards such as MITRE ATT&CK, MITRE CAPEC, TaHiTI, and PASTA

1.3 Describe the limiting factors of detection tools for malware behavior, propagation, and detection

1.4 Describe the advantages and disadvantages of automation (such as artificial intelligence and machine learning) in the operation of a SOC

1.5 Determine differences in tactics, techniques, and procedures of an advanced persistent threat and threat actor using logs

1.6 Interpret a threat intelligence report and draw conclusions about a threat actor (known advanced persistent threat/commodity human-driven/commodity machine-driven)

2.1 Select the threat modeling approach for a given scenario

2.2 Use MITRE ATT&CK to model threats (tactics, techniques, and procedures or changes in tactics, techniques, and procedures)

2.3 Describe the uses of structured and unstructured threat hunting

2.4 Determine the priority level of attacks based on the Cyber Kill Chain and MITRE ATT&CK

2.5 Determine the priority level of attacks based on the MITRE CAPEC model

2.6 Perform threat intelligence handling: gathering, cataloging, utilizing, and removing

3.1 Determine attack tactics, techniques, and procedures using logs

3.2 Interpret tactics, techniques and procedures of a given threat actor

3.3 Select the delivery method, payload, tactic, or timeline that indicates an authorized assessment or an attack (threat actor or penetration tester)

3.4 Determine usable artifacts for detection of advanced persistent threat actors at all levels of the Pyramid of Pain

4.1 Use scripting languages (such as Python and PowerShell) to augment detection or analytics

4.2 Perform a cloud-native threat hunt

4.3 Determine undetected threats using endpoint artifacts

4.4 Determine the C2 communications to and from infected hosts using endpoint applications, processes, and logs

4.5 Select suspicious activity using session and protocol data

4.6 Determine the stage of infection within C2 communications using traffic data

4.7 Select weakness in code using code-level analysis tools (such as PE Checker, BURP Suite, and SEM Grep)

4.8 Describe the analysis process for applications and operating systems used by IoT devices

4.9 Describe memory-resident attacks and how to perform analysis using memory-specific tools (such as Volatility)

4.10 Construct a signature for detection or analysis

4.11 Recognize the likelihood of attack by an attack vector within a given environment

5.1 Describe the process to identify memory-resident attacks

5.2 Determine compromises by reverse engineering

5.3 Determine known and unknown gaps in detection

5.4 Interpret data from memory-specific tools

5.5 Construct a runbook or playbook to address a detectable scenario

5.6 Recommend tools, configurations, detection, and deception techniques for a given scenario

5.7 Recommend attack remediation strategies based on the results of a threat assessment

5.8 Recommend changes to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of a threat hunt

5.9 Recommend security countermeasures and mitigations for identified risks

6.1 Describe how multiproduct integration enhances data visibility within a product and accelerates analysis

6.2 Diagnose analytical gaps using threat hunting methodologies

6.3 Recommend a mitigation strategy to block C2 traffic

6.4 Recommend changes in hunt capability to advance to the next Threat Hunting Maturity Model phase

6.5 Recommend changes to a detection methodology to augment analytical and process gaps

6.6 Use presentation resources to convey findings and direct environmental change

1. The integration of which products would most enhance analytical capabilities for threat hunting?

A. Standalone antivirus solutions

B. Disconnected SIEM and endpoint detection and response (EDR) platforms

C. SIEM, EDR, and threat intelligence platforms

D. Uncoordinated firewall and intrusion prevention systems

Answer: C

 

2. A comprehensive playbook addresses which phases of incident response? (Choose two)

A. Detection

B. Budget planning

C. Recovery

D. Lunch break scheduling

Answer: A, C

 

3. When using the MITRE ATT&CK framework to model threats, changes in ________ are critical for understanding evolving attack strategies.

A. tactics, techniques, and procedures

B. encryption algorithms

C. software development methodologies

D. organizational policies

Answer: A

 

4. Changes to a detection methodology to augment analytical and process gaps might include: (Choose two)

A. Decreasing the use of automation and machine learning

B. Integrating threat intelligence feeds

C. Implementing behavioral analysis techniques

D. Relying solely on signature-based detection

Answer: B, C

 

5. Which level of the Pyramid of Pain is most difficult for attackers to change and adapt to when detected?

A. Hash values

B. IP addresses

C. Domain names

D. HTTPs (Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures)

Answer: D

 

6. Detection tools are limited in their effectiveness due to: (Choose two)

A. The dynamic nature of cyber threats

B. The physical security of the data center

C. Encryption used by network protocols

D. The evolving tactics of threat actors

Answer: A, D

 

7. How can logs help in identifying the tactics, techniques, and procedures of a threat actor?

A. By showing the time of day attacks are most likely to occur

B. By revealing patterns and anomalies that indicate malicious activity

C. By indicating the level of user satisfaction with IT services

D. By tracking the number of successful phishing attempts

Answer: B

 

8. What indicates a successful C2 communication detection using endpoint logs? (Choose two)

A. Increased outbound traffic to unknown IPs

B. Frequent system reboots

C. Unusual process tree formations

D. High volume of encrypted data sent to known ports

Answer: A, C

 

9. ________ involves proactively searching through networks to detect and isolate advanced threats that evade existing security solutions.

A. Compliance auditing

B. Network optimization

C. Threat hunting

D. Software development

Answer: C

 

10. Endpoint artifacts are crucial for uncovering undetected threats. Which of the following are considered endpoint artifacts? (Choose two)

A. Router configuration files

B. Windows Registry keys

C. Bash history in Linux

D. DNS server logs

Answer: B, C